Skip to content
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Menu
  • About Us
    • Editorial team
    • Contact us
  • Resources for authors, reviewers & editors
  • In the journal
    • Volumes and issues
    • Editorials
    • Free & Open Access Articles
  • The JBI Blog
  • Calls for Papers, Events & Careers
Menu

Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection

Posted on May 26, 2020May 26, 2020 by The JBI

Original Research

Open Access. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry volume 16, p405–414 (2019). Published online: 15 August 2019

James M. Kemper, Christopher Gyngell & Julian Savulescu

Abstract: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows the detection of genetic abnormalities in embryos produced through in vitro fertilization (IVF). Current funding models in Australia provide governmental subsidies for couples undergoing IVF, but do not extend to PGD. There are strong reasons for publicly funding PGD that follow from the moral principles of autonomy, beneficence and justice for both parents and children. We examine the objections to our proposal, specifically concerns regarding designer babies and the harm of disabled individuals, and show why these are substantially outweighed by arguments for subsidizing PGD. We argue that an acceptance of PGD is aligned with present attitudes towards procreative decision making and IVF use, and that it should therefore receive government funding.

Read article in full here.

Category: Selected Articles, Utrinque Paratus

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

To receive email alerts when new Journal of Bioethical Inquiry issues are published as well as occasional calls for papers and event and job notifications - please subscribe below.

Connect with the JBI community on LinkedIn.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

© 2026 Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
7ads6x98y